What Happens When You're More in Love Than Your Guy Is
Why Men Don't Listen to Women in Relationships
The 5 Ultimate Rules of Online Dating
5 Ways to Fight Fair With Your Man
3 Sure-Fire Signs You've Found Your Soulmate!
Fake Lines Guys Use in Online Dating Profiles
How to Get a Toxic Guy Out of Your Life
What Guys Do When They Get Caught Cheating
Instead of reading the (irrational) conclusions of the author of the blog, read the study itself:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/per.768/pdf
Can you find the word “game” in the study? In particular read the ending – outcomes:
“As expected by Hypothesis 1a, men and women who were judged (by independent raters) as facially or vocally attractive, or who were slim according to their objectively measured BMI, were chosen more often by their dating partners.”
“For men, only facial and vocal attractiveness and sociosexuality increased the frequency of matches, for women only facial attractiveness, and the predictions tended to be weaker for matches than for received choices in all four cases (see Table 3).”
How does it prove the “validity of game”? The above quotes (I could find more) deny what the PUAs teach (“all that matters are skills”).
One more thing, the study only took into account facial attractiveness, it did not take into account genotypes – like I often repeat “genes” are not the same thing as “beauty”. Anyway, in both cases it cannot be interpreted as a confirmation of the “validity of game”.
Why Men Don't Listen to Women in Relationships
The 5 Ultimate Rules of Online Dating
5 Ways to Fight Fair With Your Man
3 Sure-Fire Signs You've Found Your Soulmate!
Fake Lines Guys Use in Online Dating Profiles
How to Get a Toxic Guy Out of Your Life
What Guys Do When They Get Caught Cheating
Instead of reading the (irrational) conclusions of the author of the blog, read the study itself:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/per.768/pdf
Can you find the word “game” in the study? In particular read the ending – outcomes:
“As expected by Hypothesis 1a, men and women who were judged (by independent raters) as facially or vocally attractive, or who were slim according to their objectively measured BMI, were chosen more often by their dating partners.”
“For men, only facial and vocal attractiveness and sociosexuality increased the frequency of matches, for women only facial attractiveness, and the predictions tended to be weaker for matches than for received choices in all four cases (see Table 3).”
How does it prove the “validity of game”? The above quotes (I could find more) deny what the PUAs teach (“all that matters are skills”).
One more thing, the study only took into account facial attractiveness, it did not take into account genotypes – like I often repeat “genes” are not the same thing as “beauty”. Anyway, in both cases it cannot be interpreted as a confirmation of the “validity of game”.